Dr. Dave Science

Providing Simple Answers to Everyday Science Questions.

Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

The Flu Virus is a Terrorist?

Posted by drdavescience on December 29, 2009

In a recent PBS documentary about the 1918 flu pandemic, a virology expert described the flu virus as "a little terrorist."

I must say the description is spot-on.

Think about it: a flu virus works by invading cells that line the airways and literally hijacks cellular machinery to make copies of itself. When it expends the cell's resources, it effectively kills the host cell and the newly created viruses that are free to infect neighboring cells where the process continues.

It seems the flu and extreme religious ideology have something in common. Well, at least metaphorically.

Happy New Year!

Dr. Dave

Posted via email from Dr. Dave Science

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Kills flu virus…nope

Posted by drdavescience on December 14, 2009

My coworker has a box of Lysol disinfecting wipes on her desk and I felt compelled to take a picture of the label. Why? The bright yellow label at the top says "Kills Flu Virus."

So what?

For starters, the flu virus–any virus, for that matter–is not alive. Viruses lack the basic machinery that makes life possible from bacteria to humans and everything in between. In general, viruses cannot replicate DNA, assemble proteins and sugars, or generate energy. Instead a virus must rely on a target cell to do all the work. (We can delve further, but I'll stop here.)

So, with the above in mind, how can you kill something that's not alive? The word "destroy" seems more appropriate, don't you think?

Semantics aside, very few people would actually notice (or care) that a virus can not be be killed. Focus on the big-picture: a simple non-living virus can cause tremendous harm to humans. Now that is something to notice.

-Dr. Dave

Posted via email from Dr. Dave Science

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Science in the news: The uproar over recent breast cancer screening recommendations

Posted by drdavescience on November 29, 2009

The outcry over the new recommendations for breast cancer screening seems to have subsided this week. As a recap, an expert panel advocates mammography for women 49 years or younger after consultation with their doctor; women 50 years and older should be screened every 2 years.

Why the change?

A panel of cancer experts evaluated medical data from women with breast cancer, looking specifically at factors such as age, treatment history and outcomes. After analyzing the data, the researchers observed both benefits and harms of early screening in women 49 years or younger.

Wait, harms of early detection? Really?

The harms the expert panel mentions are false-positive results, unnecessary biopsies, and over-diagnosis. The frequency of these events were greater in women 49 years and younger, and may outweigh the benefits of early screening in many women.

Diana Petitti, the Vice Chair of the expert panel had this to say:

"So, what does this mean if you are a woman in your 40s? You should talk to your doctor and make an informed decision about whether a mammography is right for you based on your family history, general health, and personal values."

Well said.

Dr. Dave

Posted via email from Dr. Dave Science

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

NASA Test Launch of Ares

Posted by drdavescience on October 28, 2009

Check out NASA TV to see the test launch of the new Ares rocket. How exciting!

Mission Control is waiting on weather; I hope it cooperates!

Dr. Dave

Posted via email from Dr. Dave Science

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Flu from the Flu Shot? Not! Part 1

Posted by drdavescience on October 23, 2009

A few weeks ago I received my annual flu shot. Although I had heard stories about people describing "flu-like" symptoms after vaccination, I had never experienced a problem over the past 10 years. This year was different.

Within hours of the injection my arm was sore; by the end of the day I felt achy, tired and I had a low grade fever. I would say that my symptoms were "flu-like," but if you think about it, many illness that are not the flu often start off with "flu-like" symptoms.

According to the scientific data contained in the vaccine's prescribing information, the symptoms I described are common (read the section on adverse events).

But is it the Flu?
According to the CDC, it takes an average of 2 days from exposure to the flu virus before showing signs of illness. Since the side effects occurred within a few hours of vaccination, it must be something else.

What is it? Stay tuned…

Dr. Dave

Posted via email from Dr. Dave Science

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

My Laptop is Alive!

Posted by drdavescience on October 23, 2009

Hello!

My laptop has been given a new lease on life thanks to the kind and knowledgeable folks atwww.powerbookmedic.com. Thank you!

I'm testing a few applications right now and thinking about everyday science concerns. Posts to come soon!

Dr. Dave

Posted via email from Dr. Dave Science

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Computer Failure

Posted by drdavescience on October 16, 2009

My beloved laptop of the past 6 years suffered a catastrophic hard drive failure. Since the other components work great, I’m having the hard drive replaced. (It’s the less expensive options, and in this economy, it’s a wise choice.)

Once I get it up and running, I hope to post more frequently. In the meantime, I’ve been writing my ideas down in a notebook.

Thanks for your patience!

Dr. Dave

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

How high do fireworks fly?

Posted by drdavescience on July 22, 2009

During a recent fireworks show, a friend had asked me if I knew how high the fireworks fly before it explodes. I didn’t know the answer but  I began to wonder how I could figure it out.

fireworks

Judging the height of an object in the sky is not easy without a reference. Maybe if I knew the height of a nearby building or tree? With a height reference I could probably estimate the height of a firework with some  accuracy.

Low clouds can be a helpful indicator of height. I can simply gauge the altitude of the firework relative to the cloud. The altitude of a cloud can be found on weather websites like www.wunderground.com.

But wait, what if there are no clouds or buildings nearby?

I gave this a thought and came up with a way to estimate the height using a grade-school trick and math.

Thunderstorms, the Speed of Light and the Speed of Sound

Lightening and thunder occur during a thunderstorm. Lightening is the discharge of electricity between clouds, from a cloud to the ground, or vice versa. Most people don’t see the actual lightening bolt, but they’ll often see a flash. Thunder is the sound a lightening bolt makes and is often heard after a flash is seen.

thunderstorm

In grade school,  I learned to tell how far away a lightening strike is by counting the number of seconds between seeing a lightening flash and hearing the sound of thunder.  Each second is about 1000 feet (1114 feet to be exact), so if I counted 5 seconds between lightening flash and hearing thunder, then the strike was about 5000 feet away (or about 1 mile).

This trick works because light travels incredibly fast when compared to sound.

What does this have to do with fireworks?

When watching the fireworks show with my friends, I could see the explosion before could hear it. So, just like I do for a thunderstorm, I began counting the number of seconds between the time I saw a firework explode and when I heard the explosion.

Most of fireworks I saw that night had a delay of 2  seconds or less. This corresponds to about 2000 feet. Keep in mind that this does not mean that the fireworks fly 2000 feet high. Take a look at the diagram below:

FireworkTriangle

(Please forgive the quality of the diagrams in this post as I made them while eating lunch at work.)

As you can see from the diagram, I drew a triangle to help me solve the height problem.

Notice that the 2000 feet I estimated using the timing trick corresponds to the distance from me to the fireworks. In geometry speak, this is called the hypotenuse, the longest side of the triangle.  You can also see that the other two sides of the triangle corresponds the height and my distance to the launcher, which we don’t know. Now, let’s figure out the height using trigonometry.

Wait…trigonometry!?! That’s a scary word!

Actually, trigonometry is not a scary word once you know what it means. “Trigon” refers to a triangle and “ometry” refers to measuring. Are you afraid of measuring triangles? I didn’t think so.

Several thousand years ago, some clever people figured out how to solve problems like ours using triangles. Even to this day, triangles are used to solve problems in engineering, medicine, architecture and aviation.

How to solve our problem?

When dealing with a triangle, we can use some easy rules of trigonometry to figure out our problem. For instance, there are two useful right triangles (triangles with a 90° angle) that can make problem solving really easy. These two triangles are the 30°-60°-90° right triangle and the 45°-45°-90° right triangle shown below:

right-triangles

In these two types of triangles, the sides exist in a fixed ratio. Always!  This means, if you know the length of one side, and an angle,  you can figure out the length of the other sides by using the ratios.

Back to the fireworks problem

To figure out the height of the firework, I need to figure out how much I tilted my head to see the fireworks. This will help me figure out which triangle to use. Since this is an estimate, it’s okay to guess. I know I wasn’t craning my neck up or looking straight ahead. I’d guess that I was looking about 30° to 45° up.

Take a look at the diagram below:

Solved Right TrianglesIf I was looking about 30° up, I would use the 30°-60°-90° right triangle. Using the ratios, a hypotenuse of 2000 feet would correspond to a height of 1000 feet.

If I was looking about 45° up, I would use the 45°-45°-90° right triangle. Using the ratios, a hypotenuse of 2000 feet would correspond to a height of 1414 feet.

Therefore, using the thunderstorm timing trick and trigonometry, I would estimate that fireworks I saw that night flew up to about 1000 to 1500 feet.

Keep in mind that approach is not perfect, that’s why it’s an estimate. An estimate gets us close to the exact answer. There were issues about timing between seeing and hearing the explosion, the angle the firework was launched,  as well as effects of the wind.

Even if we had the exact data, we would still use trigonometry to solve the problem.

Enjoy!

Dr. Dave

Posted in How does it work?, Math, Physics, Problem Solving, Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Your Oil Dollars at Work!

Posted by drdavescience on June 5, 2009

This post doesn’t have much to do with science. I couldn’t believe what I read and so I had to write write about it.

I had heard a while back that a Saudi prince is purchasing a VIP Airbus A380 Super Jumbo as his private jet. In case you are wondering, the A380 is the largest passenger aircraft (it’s bigger than a 747).

At first I thought it was a joke. The plane is so huge that I could not imagine that somebody would want it for a private jet.

Just recently, I found out that the story is true. Here’s the plan for the proposed interior.


The custom VIP A380 costs $500 million; that’s half a billion dollars! It’ll cost him more to fuel, fly and maintain it. Considering that this same Saudi prince already owns a VIP 747, surely there could be better ways to spend $500 million than to purchase a bigger plane.

How about providing the best health care to his people? What about investing in education and technology so they’ll have something to rely on when their oil supply finally runs out?

Hey, it’s not my money so why should I bother, right? Think about it the next time you’re at the gas pump.

Dr. Dave

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Hubble Space Telescope

Posted by drdavescience on May 19, 2009

NASA’s mission to fix the Hubble Space Telescope is taking top billing in the science news this week. (Take that swine flu!) Astronauts recently completed a series of grueling repairs that will extend the telescope’s functional life to 2014.


When the telescope was launched in 1990, NASA scientists soon discovered that the main mirror that allowed the Hubble telescope to “see” were slightly off from the design specifications by about a millimeter. In the everyday world, being off by a millimeter is no big deal, but for the Hubble telescope this tiny error meant that it was unable to “see” distant galaxies very clearly.

In 1993, NASA sent a repair mission to the Hubble telescope and fixed the problem. Since then, the Hubble telescope has returned amazing images of distant galaxies and helped astronomers and astrophysicists better understand our universe.

The website www.hubblesite.org has an amazing gallery of pictures taken from the Hubble telescope. I hope they don’t mind, but I’ve posted a few pictures that are simple out of this world!

Mars


Jupiter

Galaxies


I think it’s amazing that the bright dots in each galaxy is a star. Keep in mind that the Sun is also a star, which means it’s possible for other stars to have orbiting planets, perhaps even one similar to our own!

Dr. Dave

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »